Land law coursework Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Land law coursework - Essay ExampleThis certificate and the registration as the new owner of the property award him all the rights of the house (Dowden 4). His have-to doe withs in this case be therefore beneficial interests since he is the proprietor of the instrument and so the legal owner. In case of any court cases, the registration and the transfer of the certificate of registration and ownership will be proof enough of his top interests in the property above all the others and it overrides the interests of all. Once the ownership rights have been transferred to him, it is up to him therefore to decide what to do with rest of the people who were intertwined with Abigail especially doubting Thomas (her father) and Michael (the tenant). Thomas is a trustee of Abigail in the registered land and he therefore has his own overriding interests in the land and its instruments. His overriding interests in that property are brought about by the fact that the registrar did not record h is interests or agreements with his daughter when transferring the property from Gareth and this is according to s 78 of the LRA 2002. Thomas assisted Abigail with oneness fifth of the payment money required to purchase Heavenly Mews and they drafted an express trust. The form of express trust drafted however was not revealed and hence the interest which Thomas has in the instrument is not known. There are different forms of trust which according to English Law may have been drafted in this scenario by the father and daughter. These trusts must have to mention the beneficiary since it is not a charitable trust that Thomas drafted with his daughter. The interest which Thomas may have on the property of Abigail being a trustee may however not be granted or addressed by the courts. This is because according to the Variation of Trusts work of 1958, the court lacks power to consent trust ascertained to an individual who is suijuris that is the one who is above the age of consent and wh o is of sound mind like Abigail (Dowden 64). If the case of Savill v Goodall 1993 1 FLR 755 is to be followed, then Thomas would have claimed his share of the money paid for the house since there was an express trust agreement. The fact that Thomas stayed on and off with his daughter Abigail before she sold the property does not have any effect on the interest according to the act and hence is too not admissible court. The interest therefore remains to be null and void unless Stephen who is the bona fide owner of the property instrument decides to share it or enter into pronounce tenancy or ownership with him (but it is not a must). The other person who may have an interest on the property once Abigail has sold it is Michael who was a tenant of Abigail for around two months before she sold the house to Stephen. There is no mention of any formality being written that explains the tenancy scathe of Michael and Abigail. The case does not state whether the tenancy had commenced or it was to commence in less than one-third months. In the event that it was to commence in less than three months, then the interest will be considered as override interest. If the tenancy in this case was an actual occupation, Michael will have an interest according to Sch 3 para 2 as in the case Abbey National BS v Cann 1991. If he has this interest, the Stephen will have to assume